Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How Trump finally got his travel ban, in a flowchart

Lower courts rejected travel bans several times. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of this one.

President Donald Trump finally has his travel ban.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the most recent version of the travel ban in Trump v. Hawaii. This isn’t the same executive order that generated a huge backlash in the early days of Trump’s presidency. That order banned all people from seven majority-Muslim countries for 90 days and nearly all refugees for 120 days — and was struck down by the courts.

This latest executive order, the administration’s third try at a travel ban, doesn’t just apply to majority-Muslim countries, but also North Korea and Venezuela.

So how did Trump finally get his travel ban? This chart shows the three executive orders and the times lower courts struck them down, all leading up to Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling that allows the most recent ban to continue.

Of course, what’s not shown in this flowchart is Trump’s campaign proposal to stop all Muslims from coming to the US — a point that opponents of the ban argued revealed the fundamentally anti-Muslim (and hence unconstitutional) nature of the ban.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor pointed out this line of events in her dissent: “It leaves undisturbed a policy first advertised openly and unequivocally as a ‘total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States’ because the policy now masquerades behind a façade of national-security concerns.”

To be clear, Tuesday’s ruling doesn’t explicitly rule on the merits of the ban. It sends it back for the 9th Circuit Court to reconsider — but the Supreme Court’s decision makes it difficult for courts to strike down the ban.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters