Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Prosecutor: Roger Stone lied because “the truth looked bad for Donald Trump”

Stone’s trial began with the prosecution’s fiery opening statement.

Roger Stone, wearing dark shades and a grey suit, steps out of a car.
Roger Stone, wearing dark shades and a grey suit, steps out of a car.
Roger Stone, former advisor to President Trump, arrives for the second day of his trial at the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse in Washington, DC on November 6, 2019.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Roger Stone’s trial kicked off in earnest Wednesday with a fiery opening statement from prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky, and the statement was peppered with references to Donald Trump.

“In a critical investigation of national importance, the defendant, Roger Stone, repeatedly lied under oath to a congressional committee and lied under oath to cover up his tracks,” Zelinsky said.

“The evidence will show that Roger Stone lied to the House Intelligence Committee because the truth looked bad,” Zelinsky continued. “The truth looked bad for the Trump campaign and the truth looked bad for Donald Trump.”

Stone advised Trump on politics on and off for about three decades, and after a brief stint on Trump’s official presidential campaign in 2015, he began supporting Trump from the outside instead.

Stone was indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller on seven total counts of obstruction, false statements, and witness tampering related to his alleged attempts to mislead the House Intelligence Committee about his communications involving WikiLeaks and hacked Democratic emails in 2016. Mueller has since left his post, and the prosecution is being handled by the US attorney’s office for Washington, DC. Stone has pleaded not guilty.

Zelinsky confirmed that former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon — who was the Trump campaign’s CEO — will be called to testify at the trial. “You’re gonna hear from Steve Bannon,” the prosecutor told the jury.

He also revealed new evidence that was not previously known, related to Stone’s contacts with the Trump campaign. Specifically, he said:

  • On June 14, 2016, after the Democratic National Committee announced they had been hacked by the Russian government, Roger Stone called Trump.
  • On July 31, 2016, a few days after Stone had told his associate Jerome Corsi to “get to [WikiLeaks founder Julian] Assange” and get ahold of “emails” WikiLeaks had, Stone called Trump again. About an hour after the call, Stone emailed Corsi again, to say a friend of theirs in London should see Assange.
  • On August 2, 2016, Corsi emailed Stone about what he said were Assange’s plans, and mentioned “Podesta” — a reference to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair whose emails were also hacked. The next day, Stone emailed Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort, saying that he had an idea “to save Trump’s ass.”
  • On August 18, 2016, shortly after Bannon had been named CEO of the Trump campaign, Stone emailed Bannon, saying that he knew how to win this election, but “it ain’t pretty.”

Zelinsky admitted that he does not know what Trump and Stone discussed on the phone. Still, the calls were not previously known — and they reveal that Stone was still in touch with Trump personally around the time Stone professed to have knowledge of WikiLeaks’s plans to release emails damaging to the Clinton campaign.

Much of this information is likely in the Mueller report, but redacted, to avoid prejudicing Stone’s trial. Now, we’re finally learning what’s under some of those black bars.

The defense will give an opening statement Wednesday afternoon. Read my fuller explainer on Stone’s trial for more.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explainedTrump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explained
The Logoff

Afghan refugees currently in Qatar could be sent to Congo by the Trump administration.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explainedThe wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explained
Politics

The Court’s Republican majority fractured in a case that could impact everyone from immigrants to consumers.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zonesThe Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zones
Politics

When can the Trump administration strip legal protections from migrants who risk death in their home countries?

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.
Politics

Trump’s gerrymandering efforts are backfiring.

By Christian Paz
The Logoff
Why the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandateWhy the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandate
The Logoff

US soldiers are now free to get the flu.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something newThe war in Iran isn’t ending — it’s becoming something new
Politics

Why this conflict is so hard to end.

By Joshua Keating