Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

2020 Democrats may skip the next presidential debate over a labor dispute

All seven candidates who qualified for the debate said they wouldn’t cross a picket line.

Democratic presidential candidates arrive on stage before the start of a debate at Tyler Perry Studios on November 20, 2019, in Atlanta.
Democratic presidential candidates arrive on stage before the start of a debate at Tyler Perry Studios on November 20, 2019, in Atlanta.
Democratic presidential candidates arrive on stage before the start of a debate at Tyler Perry Studios on November 20, 2019, in Atlanta.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

On Friday afternoon, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) declared that she was willing to boycott next week’s Democratic debate at Loyola Marymount University in California in solidarity with campus workers who are picketing for better pay and health care.

She immediately set off a domino effect that would eventually see every other Democratic presidential candidate who qualified for the debate make the same pledge.

Unite Here Local 11 — a union that represents 150 cooks, dishwashers, cashiers, and servers on LMU’s campus who are employed by the food services company Sodexo — plans to picket at the debate next Thursday to express their disapproval of Sodexo’s handling of negotiations with the union.

“Honestly, the proposals are relatively modest ― living wage, improvements on health care,” Susan Minato, co-president of Unite Here Local 11, told HuffPost. “So we did not anticipate that there would be ... difficulty over it. But we were wrong. They abruptly canceled negotiations.”

Sodexo has disputed Minato’s characterization. “Sodexo is 100 percent committed to reaching an agreement, and any statement that we have left the bargaining table is not accurate,” a Sodexo spokesperson told Vox.

On Friday, Warren tweeted support for the union in its standoff with Sodexo and pledged to skip the debate if the labor dispute is not resolved by then. In her tweet, she called on the Democratic National Committee, which organizes the debates, to “find a solution” to the problem.

About 30 minutes later, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) made a similar pledge, tweeting that he would “not be crossing [Unite Here Local 11’s] picket line.”

Within the next few hours, all of the other 2020 candidates who have qualified for the debate made the same pledge in rapid succession: first, businessman Andrew Yang, who was followed (in order) by former Vice President Joe Biden, billionaire activist Tom Steyer, South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN).

Warren’s decision to move first to apply pressure on Sodexo and the DNC underscored her political and policy commitments to organized labor and the working class.

While every major Democratic presidential candidate supports organized labor, it’s telling that Warren and Sanders were the first candidates to back the union and to risk missing a debate in a demonstration of their principles.

It’s also not surprising that Buttigieg, a candidate who has carved out a niche for himself as an establishment-friendly moderate, was one of the last to make the same commitment.

Campus workers and students have protested against Sodexo at LMU over claims that the corporation has not provided a “fair contract” to employees since November.

Sodexo, which provides catering services to many universities across the nation, has a reputation for exploitation. For years, labor activists and watchdogs have documented poor pay, dangerous work conditions, and anti-union tactics among Sodexo’s hundreds of thousands of employees around the world.

With all of the candidates pledging to boycott the debate unless the labor dispute is resolved, there is a theoretical possibility that the debate could be canceled entirely. But most likely, the public scrutiny will force the DNC and Sodexo to find some kind of resolution.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters