Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

These Brits literally cannot believe how much US health care costs

“If you don’t have money, you’re fudged.” A devastating verdict from abroad on US health care costs.

This UK woman cannot believe how much it costs to deliver a baby in America.
This UK woman cannot believe how much it costs to deliver a baby in America.
This UK woman cannot believe how much it costs to deliver a baby in America.
JOE/Twitter Media
Dylan Scott
Dylan Scott covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017.

People in Great Britain find it literally unfathomable how much health care can cost in the United States. $250 for an inhaler? The young woman looks aghast.

“Man, so if you’re poor, you’re dead,” she says.

The same exasperation recurs again and again in this video from JOE, an online news site for young millennials in the UK and Ireland. $600 for an EpiPen? Unimaginable. $10,000 to give birth to your baby?! For a baby?!? $40 to have skin-to-skin contact with your newborn baby after you do?!?!?

“If you don’t have money, you’re fudged,” the same young woman concludes.

The immediate context for this bit of viral content (which has a clear point of view, as you can tell from the tweet and the “Fuck Trump!” peppered in at the end) is the reports that the American pharmaceutical industry wanted President Donald Trump to use the specter of Brexit and new trade negotiations between the UK and US to open up the British market to US health care companies.

Trump himself had suggested the same, but Prime Minister Boris Johnson said recently that his country’s National Health Service would not be on the table in any upcoming trade talks.

But even if that issue is moot, it’s true the United States spends a lot more money on health care than any other country because the prices for medical services are so much higher here.

First, on aggregate spending, the United States, with our public-private patchwork of a system, spends more than twice as much money per person on health care than the United Kingdom. The UK has both nationalized health insurance (meaning everybody is covered by a government plan) and a nationalized medical sector (meaning most hospitals and doctors are owned by or employed by the government, too).

Peterson-KFF Health Systems Tracker

The prices for individual services or treatments in the United States are correspondingly far above what other wealthy developed nations pay, including the UK. In Britain, because the government covers everyone and employs the providers, it has broad authority to set rates. The Brits have developed sophisticated metrics for evaluating the value of medical services based on how much they will improve patients’ quality of life. That’s the standard by which a price is set, not whatever the market will bear.

Peterson-KFF Health Systems Tracker
Peterson-KFF Health Systems Tracker
Peterson-KFF Health Systems Tracker

And yet for all the money United States pays for our health care, we still trail our economic peers in an advanced metric known as mortality amenable to health care. It measures how well a health system does in preventing deaths that should be avoidable with access to quality health care.

Peterson-KFF Health Systems Tracker

So the flummoxed faces in that JOE video aren’t just a bunch of Brits having a laugh at their Yankee cousins — they reflect the astonishing degree to which Americans has fallen behind in providing affordable health care to its citizens.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters