Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The House easily passed Democrats’ anti-hate resolution, with some Republicans dissenting

Democrats passed the resolution at the end of a fraught week. It came after Rep. Ilhan Omar’s comments last weekend.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) in a House Education and Labor Committee meeting.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) in a House Education and Labor Committee meeting.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) participates in a House Education and Labor Committee meeting.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

The House of Representatives passed a broad resolution on Thursday to condemn hateful speech and expression, including both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.

The vote comes after first-term member Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) sparked controversy with her comments on Israel. The initial resolution, which some senior Democrats began drafting in the wake of her latest comments over the weekend, condemned only anti-Semitism and was seen as a direct reprimand to Omar, who is Muslim.

The revised resolution easily passed on Thursday afternoon, even with 23 Republicans dissenting, including House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney (R-WY).

But the lead-up was not easy. The resolution was being drafted up to the moment it was sent to the floor for debate; in fact, debate had to be pushed back in order for resolution authors to update the draft, adding more minority groups that had been left out.

Earlier this week, Democratic leaders encountered a backlash from Congressional Black Caucus and Congressional Progressive Caucus members who questioned why Democrats were chastising Omar in the age of Donald Trump, Democrats drafted a second resolution. Neither mentioned Omar by name, but the second one was updated to include a condemnation of Islamophobia and white supremacy, making clear it was about more than her comments.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told reporters on Tuesday that Omar’s name did not need to be included in the text of the resolution.

“It’s not about her, it’s about these forms of hatred,” Pelosi said at her weekly press conference on Thursday.

Pelosi, who spoke with Omar last weekend over the phone, said she does not plan to make the representative formally apologize for her latest comments. Pelosi added she did not believe Omar intended her remarks to be anti-Semitic, although they were perceived that way by some members.

“It’s up to her to explain, but I do not believe she understood the full weight of the words,” Pelosi said. “I feel confident her words were not based on any anti-Semitic attitude, but that she didn’t have a full appreciation for how they landed.”

There’s another reason House leaders were eager to vote on the resolution; they have a big vote coming up on Friday on HR 1, the sweeping anti-corruption bill that was their first bill of the year. This is Democrats’ signature issue, and they do not want the bill’s vote marred by continued infighting.

But whether the issue goes away so easily remains to be seen.

What’s in the final resolution

Not long after the House passed a resolution condemning Rep. Steve King (R-IA) for his repeated white supremacist rhetoric, the new resolution condemns both anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim discrimination as “hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States.”

It contains lengthy definitions of anti-Semitism and anti-Islamic rhetoric, and blanket condemnations for attacks against both communities in the United States, as well as hateful speech and expression.

But the resolution also contains a section appearing to refer to the kind of language Omar was using last weekend. Though Omar didn’t explicitly refer to Israel in her latest comments, she said, “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country.”

As Vox’s Zack Beauchamp wrote:

In full context, Omar doesn’t explicitly identify who or what this “political influence” is coming from. But given her previous comments, the latest remarks struck many observers as playing into well-worn anti-Semitic tropes about Jewish attachments to Israel making them disloyal to the United States.

“Be it resolved the House of Representatives rejects the perpetuation of anti-Semitic stereotypes in the United States and around the world, including the pernicious myth of dual loyalty and foreign allegiance, especially in the context of support for the United States-Israel alliance,” the resolution reads.

You can read the full text of the resolution here. This post has been updated with the latest draft of the resolution.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters