Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Student loans are about to get worse

Trump’s new law is a major change to higher education. Here’s what that means for you.

Justice Department Launches Compliance Review Of Admission Policies At Stanford And Several University Of California Schools
Justice Department Launches Compliance Review Of Admission Policies At Stanford And Several University Of California Schools
The One Big Beautiful Bill could make it harder for people to earn advanced degrees.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Abdallah Fayyad
Abdallah Fayyad was a correspondent at Vox, where he covers the impacts of social and economic policies. He was the author of “Within Our Means,” a biweekly newsletter on ending poverty in America.

University tuition in the United States is notoriously expensive — so much so that Americans currently have over $1.6 trillion in student loan debt. But now, the routine process of taking out student loans has been overhauled as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill, which President Donald Trump signed into law last week.

The new law eliminates some student loan programs and adds borrowing caps that could make it harder for people to earn advanced degrees. In some cases, it could make financing college more difficult.

Related

“This bill makes monumental changes to the higher education system,” said Sarah Sattelmeyer, project director for education, opportunity, and mobility in the Higher Education initiative at the liberal think tank New America. “And a lot of the elements in the bill are going to make college more expensive or harder to access, especially for the lowest-income students, families, and borrowers.”

So what, exactly, is in this bill, and how will it impact student loan borrowers?

Borrowers will have fewer repayment options

On X, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said that the president’s spending bill “simplifies the overly complex student loan repayment system.” In a way, she’s right. The law consolidates a variety of student loan repayment options.

Before, students could choose from roughly a dozen financing options, including the Biden-era SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment plan that eventually leads to loan forgiveness. Now, they have just two options. The first is the standard repayment plan, which includes a fixed monthly payment over a set period of time based on how much someone borrowed. The second is the Repayment Assistance Plan (or RAP), which is an income-driven repayment plan where borrowers’ payments are a certain percentage of their income. The more money someone makes, the more that percentage increases.

Related

But while McMahon was right to say that the student loan repayment system is simpler, she left out the fact that dramatically limiting the number of repayment options will make it harder for people to finance their student loans according to their particular needs. “Streamlining this system is a really important goal,” Sattelmeyer said. “But one outcome of this plan is that payments would be more expensive for those at the bottom of the income ladder, and that’s a really important piece in terms of people’s ability to repay their loans.”

One analysis found that under RAP, monthly payments could be hundreds of dollars more than they are under the SAVE plan, which is currently blocked by the courts and will be officially eliminated under Trump’s new law.

The Urban Institute also pointed out that the bills passed by the House and Senate don’t account for inflation. “This means as incomes rise over time, borrowers who make the same amount of income in real terms would gradually pay a larger percentage of their income over time,” wrote Kristin Blagg, principal research associate in the Work, Education, and Labor Division at the Urban Institute.

The new caps on loans will make it harder to afford advanced degrees

As this bill was making its way through Congress, experts were warning that it could worsen America’s doctor shortage. That’s because the law imposes new limits on how much people can borrow for graduate school and scraps the Grad PLUS loan program, which allows students to take out enough loans to cover the full cost of their programs.

For graduate students, the new law puts an annual cap of $20,500 and a lifetime cap of $100,000 on borrowing. Those seeking professional degrees, like medical or law degrees, have an annual limit of $50,000 and a $200,000 limit in a lifetime. As I wrote last month, putting limits on how much money people can borrow is generally a good idea, because high amounts of debt can drag people down and get people in financial trouble. The problem is that the limits this law imposes simply won’t be enough to cover the actual costs of these programs. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the median cost of attending a four-year medical program at a public school is over $280,000. At private institutions, it’s just under $400,000.

“Loan limits are an important tool but I think the challenge here is it can be hard to know where, exactly, to set those limits,” Sattelmeyer said. “The bill also doesn’t address a lot of the other underlying issues with the program: It does not provide additional grant aid or funding to low resource students. And so it is limiting loans and not necessarily providing additional resources.”

That means that some students might be pushed to turn to private lenders, who tend to charge higher interest rates. And in some cases, borrowers might not even qualify for those private loans. “Private student loans often require a cosigner, so some students may not qualify, and they may have no options to fully finance and attend graduate school. So there is a possibility that for some students, this will be a barrier to accessing graduate school,” Sara Partridge, associate director for higher education policy at the Center for American Progress, recently told Business Insider.

It’s difficult to predict both how this bill will affect the higher education system as a whole and just how much more expensive it will be to attend universities. What’s clear is that while Republicans tout their success in passing this bill, the Americans who stand to benefit from it the most are the wealthy who will get yet more tax cuts, all while middle- and low-income households have a harder time cobbling up the funds to pay for a hard-earned degree.

More in Policy

Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Future Perfect
How Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in AmericaHow Austin’s stunning drop in rents explains housing in America
Future Perfect

We finally have some good news about housing affordability.

By Marina Bolotnikova
Future Perfect
How can you prepare your kids for AI’s disruption to the job market?How can you prepare your kids for AI’s disruption to the job market?
Future Perfect

Hint: The best educational choice you can make for your child might not focus on your child at all.

By Sigal Samuel
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
Even this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenshipEven this Supreme Court seems unwilling to end birthright citizenship
Politics

At least seven justices appear to believe that the Fourteenth Amendment means what it says.

By Ian Millhiser
The End of HIV
The 45-year fight against HIV is one of humanity’s greatest victories. It’s also in danger.The 45-year fight against HIV is one of humanity’s greatest victories. It’s also in danger.
The End of HIV

We have the tools to end the virus. The question is whether we’ll abandon them.

By Bryan Walsh