Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Welcome to Polyarchy

Welcome to Polyarchy, a Vox blog that will be produced by the political reform program at New America, a Washington think tank devoted to developing new ideas and new voices. This blog will be mostly about politics, but we use a broad definition of the word. We’ll write about the horse race of the 2016 election and about some bigger ideas of how to engage citizens and bring new ideas into the political process; we’ll write about books and culture, as well.

Polyarchy’s main authors will be Mark Schmitt and Lee Drutman of New America. Mark is a former editor of the American Prospect (where he worked with several of the current Vox writers), was an early political blogger at the Decembrist and other sites, and has worked on Capitol Hill and for a foundation. Lee is a political scientist and the author of The Business of America Is Lobbying. We’ll have frequent guest posts from our colleagues as well as from people we think have something interesting to say.

Finally, the title: Polyarchy, in Greek, means rule by the many, and can be a synonym for democracy. We’re borrowing the title from a book by the late political scientist Robert Dahl, who used it to distinguish the messy reality of politics from a kind of idealized democracy characterized by total equality and fair procedures. Like Dahl, we think the American political process can do a lot better at engaging and responding to “the many” — by expanding participation, increasing electoral competition, and reducing the ways in which the political process reinforces economic inequality. Instead of talking about unattainable ideals, like “get money out of politics,” we try to look for approaches that are realistic but ambitious. Politics and democracy, even at their best, are imperfect, messy, and confusing, but also a lot of fun, and we won’t lose sight of that ideal.

More in Polyarchy

Polyarchy
Trump support is not normal partisanshipTrump support is not normal partisanship
Polyarchy

Is Trump actually appealing to motives that differ from “normal” partisan battles?

By Lilliana Mason, John V. Kane and 1 more
Polyarchy
Challenges to parties in the United States and beyondChallenges to parties in the United States and beyond
Polyarchy

Does democracy require parties to function?

By Didi Kuo
Polyarchy
The development and decay of democracyThe development and decay of democracy
Polyarchy

The fate of social democracy should worry not only those on the left, but anyone concerned with democracy in Europe.

By Sheri Berman
Polyarchy
The dilemmas for Democrats in 3 past visions for the partyThe dilemmas for Democrats in 3 past visions for the party
Polyarchy

In the “New Deal order,” battles over the shape of American politics were waged as quarrels inside the Democrats’ big tent.

By Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman
Polyarchy
Democrats and neoliberalismDemocrats and neoliberalism
Polyarchy

These days, the meaning of “neoliberal” has become fuzzy. But it has a long history of association with the Democratic Party.

By Lily Geismer
Polyarchy
The problem with Joe Biden’s Republican “epiphany” theory of bipartisanshipThe problem with Joe Biden’s Republican “epiphany” theory of bipartisanship
Polyarchy

No Republican “epiphany” will be forthcoming.

By Lee Drutman