Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

From Jeffrey Epstein to Trump’s Ukraine phone call, whistleblowers have never been this important, says lawyer who represented MIT Media Lab whistleblower

John Napier Tye, the founder and CEO of the nonprofit law firm Whistleblower Aid, says the past 10 years have been a “Renaissance of whistleblowing” in America. His first client is now representing the anonymous Trump-Ukraine whistleblower.

President Donald Trump on the phone.
President Donald Trump on the phone.
President Donald Trump answers calls to the NORAD Santa tracker on December 24, 2018. A very different sort of phone call, with the president of Ukraine, prompted one US official to become an anonymous whistleblower.
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

From Edward Snowden to Chelsea Manning to the anonymous US official who raised the alarm about President Trump’s call with the president of Ukraine, the past 10 years have been a “Renaissance of whistleblowing” in the US, says lawyer and former State Department official John Tye.

The problem, as Snowden’s and Manning’s cases show, is that leaking information about confidential government matters can expose secrets that didn’t need to be exposed and incur legal penalties for the leaker.

That’s why Tye, who personally blew the whistle about the NSA’s Executive Order 12333, co-founded and leads the nonprofit law firm Whistleblower Aid; because whistleblowers are such a “crucial” source of accountability for both governments and private companies, Tye says, conscientious officials need legal help to alert the public without breaking the law themselves.

“Fifty years ago, if you think about the biggest threats to democracy and governance, it was things like segregation or things where there’s clear laws on the books,” Tye said on the latest episode of Recode Decode with Kara Swisher. “So much of the threats to democracy today are hidden and covert. And it’s about the control of information, the misuse of information.

“That’s true, obviously, in all these tech companies, all of these government agencies,” he added. “And so, as that happens, as threats to democracy are contingent on the control of information, the value of whistleblowers is going up every single day. And the threats to whistleblowers for retaliation and for people to find out who they are [are also going up].”

Most recently, Whistleblower Aid attracted attention for connecting New Yorker reporter Ronan Farrow with a person at MIT who knew the university was covering up donations from Jeffrey Epstein. But one of its first clients, former CIA officer Andrew Bakaj, is now himself a lawyer, representing the person who blew the whistle about Trump’s Ukraine call.

On the new podcast, Tye offered advice to wannabe whistleblowers with the caveat that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to getting information out safely and ethically.

“When whistleblowers come and ask me for advice, my first piece of advice is always talk to a lawyer first before you do anything else,” he said. “But then the very second piece of advice is secure the evidence. And typically that’s not forwarding the emails to journalists. It’s printing them off because you don’t want to create a record of forwarding to anyone.”

He also explained what makes Whistleblower Aid different from a group like WikiLeaks, where Manning released her trove of sensitive military and diplomatic documents.

“We do agree that there is a legitimate scope of secrecy for US government, at least some secrets,” Tye said. “We’re not 100 percent transparency, declassify everything, publish everything. No. There were human rights activists named in some of the Manning cables who had to leave their countries and come to the United States and leave their family, their careers behind.

“I would say there can be a place for secrecy for certain types of secrets, especially protecting people’s privacy,” he added. “But figuring out where to draw that line, I would say the whole society is struggling with that.”

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel