Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Harassment is breaking Twitter’s free speech experiment

What happens when “free speech” requires censorship?

Twitter’s announcement that it’s doubling its character limit to give users up to 280 characters per tweet made headlines this week. It was a PR campaign to show off new features that they hope will entice new users onto the platform. What it doesn’t address are the challenges facing current users and their safety on Twitter. Underneath the attention-grabbing, cosmetic changes, the platform is grappling with a much more fundamental question: When and why should it regulate hateful speech?

At its inception, Twitter was designed to be a kind of radical experiment in free speech. Users could tweet anonymously, could contact high-profile users without first getting their permission, and rarely had to worry about Twitter censoring their content. In the preamble to Twitter’s original rules, the company stated, “each user is responsible for the content he or she provides … we do not actively monitor and will not censor user content, except in limited circumstances described below.”

That anything-goes approach to building a speech platform made Twitter attractive for political dissidents and citizen journalists, but it also made it a breeding ground for abuse, giving internet trolls a powerful tool to harass their targets.

High-profile users have left the platform over Twitter’s inability to deal with its harassment problem.

That’s put pressure on Twitter to become more involved in moderating its users content, including introducing new rules to combat hate speech and targeted abuse.

But those rules raise broader questions about Twitter’s identity as a platform. If Twitter is willing to start censoring certain users’ content, is it still the free speech platform it set out to be? And if not, what is it? What kind of community is Twitter trying to create, and how confident is it in its ability to protect that community?

I talked to Tarleton Gillespie, principal researcher at Microsoft Research, and Lindy West, author of Shrill: Notes from a Loud Woman, to explore why online harassment is causing such an identity crisis at Twitter.

You can find this video and all of Vox’s videos on YouTube. Subscribe for more episodes of Strikethrough, our series exploring the media in the age of Trump.

More in Video

Video
Why Americans can’t escape credit card debtWhy Americans can’t escape credit card debt
Play
Video

Credit card APRs are now as high as 20 percent.

By Frank Posillico
Video
Why some couples are happier living apartWhy some couples are happier living apart
Play
Video

This growing relationship trend might change the way you think about living with your romantic partner.

By Gina Pollack
Video
The strange myth behind carrots and night visionThe strange myth behind carrots and night vision
Play
Video

How we fell for World War II propaganda.

By Nate Krieger
Video
Are team sports the secret to living longer?Are team sports the secret to living longer?
Play
Video

How a basketball league for “grannies” is reimagining aging.

By Benjamin Stephen
Video
How Georgia manufactured the Peach State mythHow Georgia manufactured the Peach State myth
Play
Video

It was never really about the fruit.

By Frank Posillico
Video
How smart design can benefit senior livingHow smart design can benefit senior living
Play
Video

And why it matters for retirement communities.

By Lindsey Sitz