Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Glenn Greenwald can’t get anyone to take this challenge

Glenn Greenwald speaks at a book discussion.
Glenn Greenwald speaks at a book discussion.
Glenn Greenwald speaks at a book discussion.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The most common defense for the massive expansion of government surveillance programs since 2001 is that they only negatively affect people who have something to hide. In a recent TED Talk, Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who first published documents leaked by Edward Snowden, made the case that the government’s invasions of privacy have a much broader effect than catching and curtailing terrorist or criminal activity.

Greenwald argued the people who claim they have nothing to hide don’t actually mean it. He pointed to Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg as examples of powerful people who previously defended government and corporate invasions of privacy but have also taken steps — refused to talk to some media, or bought massive properties to make outside snooping more difficult — to protect themselves from peering eyes.

“All of us have things to hide,” Greenwald said. “There are all sorts of things that we do and think that we’re willing to tell our physician or our lawyer or our psychologist or our spouse or our best friend that we would be mortified for the rest of the world to learn.”

Greenwald has devised a challenge for people that tell him they don’t worry about their privacy because they have nothing to hide: He asks them to send him all their email passwords and allow him to look through and publish anything he finds interesting. “After all, if you’re not a bad person, if you’re doing nothing wrong, you should have nothing to hide,” Greenwald quipped. “Not a single person has taken me up on that offer.”

Greenwald pointed to the empirical literature that found people are much more likely to conform — and therefore less likely to challenge authority, even when such protests are warranted — if they know they’re being watched by others.

“Even if you’re somebody who decides you never want to [challenge authority], the fact that there are other people who are willing to and able to resist and be adversarial to those in power — dissidents and journalists and activists and a whole range of others — is something that brings us all collective good that we should want to preserve,” Greenwald said. “We can try and render the chains of mass surveillance invisible or undetectable, but the constraints that it imposes on us do not become any less potent.”

Politics
We have no idea if Iran can still build a bombWe have no idea if Iran can still build a bomb
Politics

The central goal of the war is nowhere near a resolution.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
“A whole civilization will die tonight”: How Trump is threatening war crimes“A whole civilization will die tonight”: How Trump is threatening war crimes
Politics

Bombing all of Iran’s bridges and power plants would be illegal.

By Joshua Keating
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Is this the beginning of the end of the war in Iran?Is this the beginning of the end of the war in Iran?
Politics

Trump signaled that he’s ready to wrap up the conflict, but that may not be up to him.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Trump says the Iran war is over. So why won’t he end it?Trump says the Iran war is over. So why won’t he end it?
Politics

It may not be possible to TACO out of this one.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Here’s how Iran could become a “forever war”Here’s how Iran could become a “forever war”
Politics

“Mowing the grass,” explained.

By Joshua Keating