Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

US calls for major reinterpretation of international drug laws

The assistant secretary of state for drugs and law enforcement acknowledged the US would be hypocritical to allow stores like this while criticizing other countries’ marijuana legalization schemes.
The assistant secretary of state for drugs and law enforcement acknowledged the US would be hypocritical to allow stores like this while criticizing other countries’ marijuana legalization schemes.
The assistant secretary of state for drugs and law enforcement acknowledged the US would be hypocritical to allow stores like this while criticizing other countries’ marijuana legalization schemes.
Randall Benton / Sacramento Bee via Getty Images

For the first time since the beginning of the war on drugs, the US appears ready to allow other countries to relax their approaches to illicit substances.

In a little-noticed October 9 press conference, Assistant Secretary of State for Drugs and Law Enforcement Bill Brownfield acknowledged that the UN Drug Control Conventions, the pillar of international drug laws, should be reintrpreted to allow more policy flexibility. “The first of them was drafted and enacted in 1961,” he said. “Things have changed since 1961.”

Brownfield specified that the treaties should “tolerate different national drug policies, to accept the fact that some countries will have very strict drug approaches; other countries will legalize entire categories of drugs.”

Brownfield spent a lot of time specifically discussing marijuana legalization in Colorado, Washington state, and Uruguay. “How could I,” he said, “a representative of the Government of the United States of America, be intolerant of a government that permits any experimentation with legalization of marijuana if two of the 50 states of the United States of America have chosen to walk down that road?”

The statements come as the US and other countries prepare for the next General Assembly Special Session on drugs in 2016. Drug policy reformers have long seen the 2016 session as their next major opportunity to change international drug laws that have largely required participants — from the US to Uruguay to the Netherlands — to treat drugs as a law enforcement, rather than public health, issue.

Update: A spokesperson for the State Department clarified that Brownfield’s remarks didn’t intend to call for changing the UN Drug Conventions. The remarks instead advocated for a reinterpretation of the treaties. This article was updated to reflect that.

Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
3 winners and 1 loser from Election Day 20233 winners and 1 loser from Election Day 2023
Politics

Democrats had a good night. So did abortion rights. Glenn Youngkin, not so much.

By Andrew Prokop
Money
Is CBD in trouble?Is CBD in trouble?
Money

The FDA just refused to regulate the popular cannabis product as a dietary supplement. So, uh, buyer beware?

By Mary Jane Gibson
Money
Is legal weed doomed to be run by big business?Is legal weed doomed to be run by big business?
Money

Pro-marijuana advocates have become surprising foes of some efforts to legalize. Here’s why.

By Mary Jane Gibson
Video
A fact-checked debate about legal weedA fact-checked debate about legal weed
Play
Video

Two opposing perspectives and six true facts about cannabis legalization.

By Joss Fong and Laura Bult
The 2022 midterm elections, explained
A mixed night for marijuana on the ballotA mixed night for marijuana on the ballot
The 2022 midterm elections, explained

Victories in Maryland and Missouri, losses in Arkansas and the Dakotas.

By Mary Jane Gibson