Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Map: The poorest member of Congress in each state

Last month, we showed you the richest member of Congress in each state. But not all of our senators and representatives are multimillionaires — far from it (click to enlarge):

Poorest members of Congress final

CQ Roll Call used financial disclosure forms to calculate the minimum net worth of every member — check out their data here. We’ve mapped out the poorest member of Congress from each state, according to their estimates. However, there are a few important things that these calculations leave out.

You’ll notice that many of these numbers look quite low, with 41 of these members showing a negative net worth — disclosing liabilities that appear larger than their assets.

The main reason for this is that members of Congress do not have to disclose the value of their personal residences, even if they’re second homes or vacation homes. So it’s a fair bet that most of these supposedly underwater Congressmen own property that isn’t being taken into account here. Mortgages on these homes, though, must be disclosed, and do show up in these calculations as liabilities.

Members of Congress also have to disclose a range for how much each of their assets and liabilities are worth, rather than an exact amount. So for instance, Rep. David Valadao (R-CA), who's ranked as the poorest member of Congress here, actually discloses one asset (Valadao Dairy) and five liabilities (credit lines and real estate financing) that are each worth between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000, in addition to a few smaller items. So though CQ Roll Call takes the lower estimates for all of these and concludes Valadao is $3.7 million underwater, his true net worth could actually be positive, or much more hugely negative. (Read more about CQ Roll Call's methodology from Steven Dennis here.)

The only members here with an estimated net worth of less than negative $1 million are Valadao and Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), who still owes legal bills from a scandal during his tenure as a federal judge in the 1980s (he was tried for bribery, acquitted, but then impeached and removed from office by Congress, before being elected to Congress himself).

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), who became the new House GOP whip this year, also shows up here, and is estimated to be $670,000 underwater. But again, that's because he disclosed two home mortgages and two second mortgages, with the value of his homes themselves not being taken into account. Head over to CQ Roll Call's analysis for much more.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff