Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What happens when you match a Trump and Hillary supporter together? We found out.

CLEVELAND — Republicans don’t have it easy. They have to defend one of the most unlikable candidates in modern American history, a candidate who has called Mexicans criminals and women “fat pigs.“ What effect does affiliating oneself with a man who draws so much ire? It makes you less attractive to women.

That’s if you believe data from popular dating website PlentyOfFish that shows only one in three women on their site are willing to date a Trump supporter, and that proclaiming yourself a Trump voter narrows one’s dating pool by 40 percent. After hopping on the phone with research lead at PlentyOfFish Steve Oldridge, it became clear that dating data offers a unique perspective on one of the most divisive elections of all time.

Although male Trump supporters are “half as likely not to message someone of their own race” than non-Trump supporters, they are also “blocked by 40 percent more than non-Trump supporters,” Oldridge explained.

While some female Trump supporters certainly reject male Hillary Clinton supporters based on their political leanings, “male Trump supporters are more willing to date women with different views.” That’s mostly because “males are much more willing to date across political lines than females.” The reasoning is up for debate, but Oldridge hinted it may be simple numbers. Since “women are less prevalent on online dating websites, they have the opportunity to narrow the field.”

And this female aversion to male Trump supporters is reflected in social media campaigns like “Vote Trump, Get Dumped,“ which urges women to withhold sex from men who plan to vote for the Republican nominee.

To put this data to the test, we went to one of the most partisan places in America this week — the Republican National Convention in Cleveland — with the goal of matchmaking a male Trump supporter with a female Clinton supporter to see if the situation is as dire as it seems. We set up Bridget, a 31-year-old Democrat attending the convention, with Ryan, a 27-year-old Republican from Cleveland, to see if they could find common ground.

The date went surprisingly well. Although Bridget had more reservations about dating a Trump supporter than Ryan did about dating a Hillary supporter, both didn’t expect the date to go as well as it did. They talked gun control, immigration, the tax code, and #BlackLivesMatter — you know, romantic stuff. Sure, munching on pizza and wine while they did it certainly helped, but overall, they agreed on more than not.

“It’s interesting that we are politically and ideologically polar opposites but there are things we agree on,” Bridget said.

It’s not just Ryan and Bridget who are bad at predicting incompatibility across political ideologies. Studies have shown Americans think they are more ideologically opposed than they actually are.

One study asked 2,212 US participants questions about moral beliefs like fairness and cheating, and it has gone so far as to suggest that “liberals and conservatives, while differing systematically in their moral world views, are actually more similar in their moral judgments than anyone thinks.”

In fact, both conservatives and liberals exaggerated their own moral judgments and those of the opposing party. A 2012 study found that when you frame questions in terms of “fairness and care for humanity” for subjects, the differences between Republicans and Democrats are much less stark.

And although both members of each party report “looking for a partner who is like themselves” on dating sites, data indicates the younger you are, the more likely you are to be married to someone of another political ideology. And given that a growing margin of millennials don’t identify with either party, maybe political ideology will become increasingly less important in picking a mate.

Still, many political experts are predicting this election to have one of the largest gender gaps in election history, which shows a clear division between the way women and men view who can make the country better. Donald Trump has high unfavorables, but so does his contender Hillary Clinton, especially with white men. For those wishing to enter straight relationships, the election will certainly be a point of contention for heterosexual couples. Thankfully, for those who have given up on trying to find love during an election year, MapleMatch, an app that matches Americans with Canadians who can help them escape the election, could be the game-changer they are looking for.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters