Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Economists expect no change in unemployment rate in July Jobs report

Tomorrow is Jobs Day. The consensus of economic forecasters is that the economy will gain 233,000 jobs while the unemployment rate stays put at 6.1 percent.

In the context of a fifth consecutive month of payroll growth over 200,000 a steady unemployment rate would actually be better news than a falling one since a steady rate would indicate that the labor force is expanding in response to benign economic conditions and the economy is not running out of room to grow.

The context for the report is a run of good news from other economic indicators. Second quarter GDP saw a strong rebound from a bad first quarter, and there are indications that employers are even giving out wage increases. At the same time, inflation continues to be low with the particular index the Fed likes to watch still below 2 percent.

Under the circumstances, the kind of jobs numbers the forecasting consensus is calling for would be a sign of an economy that’s on track to deliver rising living standards and isn’t in much need of recalibration either way from policymakers.

Of course a disappointingly low number would be disappointing. But the more interesting question at this point is how Janet Yellen might react to a surprisingly good number. Would the Fed just celebrate? Or do central bankers have such an itchy trigger finger about inflation that a strong jobs report could lead to tighter money even in the absence of any real sign of fast-rising prices?

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff