President Trump announced Tuesday that he would withdraw the US from the Iran nuclear deal, and said he would begin reinstating high-level sanctions on the Iranian regime.
“This is a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made,” the president said during a speech at the White House.
The nuclear agreement between Iran and the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany, as well as the European Union, put tight restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for the relaxation of some punishing international sanctions on Iran. It was the Obama administration’s biggest foreign policy achievement.
Trump and other critics of the deal have argued that Iran can’t be trusted and that the agreement did not effectively end Iran’s nuclear program. But the deal’s many supporters, which include all of Washington’s closest European allies, say Iran has kept up its part of the deal and that pulling out of it would do more harm than good.
But Trump declared on Tuesday afternoon that the deal was “defective at its core.” After officially announcing the withdrawal, Trump said that the US would impose heavy sanctions on Iran and that they would work with allies to counter the Iranian threat.
Now it remains to be seen how Iran — and key US allies that have participated in the agreement — will react.
Don’t expect Biden to reenter the Iran nuclear deal right away


A picture taken on November 10, 2019, shows an Iranian flag at Bushehr nuclear power plant during an official ceremony to kick-start work on a second reactor at the facility. Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty ImagesPresident Joe Biden’s team has made clear in its earliest hours that a swift return to the Iran nuclear deal is unlikely — potentially prolonging a foreign policy crisis many in Washington had hoped to resolve quickly.
The Trump administration abandoned the agreement in 2018 and reimposed strict economic sanctions on Iran, further decimating the nation’s already struggling economy and complicating the Islamic Republic’s ability to fight the coronavirus. In defiance, Tehran purposefully surpassed caps on its nuclear development established under the deal as a pressure tactic to scare the US back into the accord. The regime’s message, in effect, was the US could either reengage diplomatically or witness Iran’s push toward a nuclear weapon.
Read Article >What Iran stockpiling uranium for a nuclear bomb is really about


A picture taken on November 10, 2019, shows an Iranian flag in Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant, during an official ceremony to kick-start works on a second reactor at the facility. Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty ImagesIran may be getting close to having enough nuclear material to make a single bomb if it chooses to do so. Although experts estimate it would still take Iran roughly a year to actually build a bomb (which it has long said it does not want to do), it’s still a worrying development.
It’s also a predictable one — in fact, it’s what many experts warned was likely to happen if President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.
Read Article >11 US troops were injured in Iran’s attack. It shows how close we came to war.


US soldiers clear rubble at the Ain al-Asad military airbase in Iraq on January 13, 2020. Ayman Henna/AFP via Getty ImagesLast week, Iran attacked two US military sites in Iraq. Now, a week later, one thing has become unmistakably clear: The US and Iran only barely avoided a potentially devastating war.
Defense One reported on Thursday night that 11 US troops sustained injuries in the strikes, which followed report after report after report that some Americans were blown out of towers and received concussions when the missiles hit.
Read Article >Iran says it’s now enriching uranium at levels higher than before nuclear deal


An Iranian flag in Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant, during an official ceremony on November 10 to start work at a second reactor at the facility. Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty ImagesIranian President Hassan Rouhani just said his country is now enriching uranium at a higher level than before the nuclear deal restricted that activity — an assertion that is likely to anger both the Trump administration and the administration’s critics.
That’s because highly enriched uranium can be used to make a nuclear bomb.
Read Article >Sean Hannity suggests bombing Iranian oil refineries to cause “major poverty for the people of Iran”


Giant portraits of Fox News anchors at the Fox News headquarters building in New York City. Erik McGregor/LightRocketAs the world waited to see how President Donald Trump would respond to the Iranian missile strikes on al-Asad airbase in Iraq, one of his favorite television hosts cheered on potential reprisals, including retaliation aimed at creating “major poverty” for Iranians.
“There is a massive price to pay. You don’t get to do what they did tonight. They’re going to get hit hard,” Fox News host Sean Hannity said Tuesday night. “The mullahs of Iran, well, they may want to watch and keep a watchful eye on the sky tonight.”
Read Article >How Trump got suckered by Iran and North Korea


President Trump addresses the country regarding the situation with Iran, on January 8, 2020. Eric Baradat/AFP via Getty ImagesWhenever President Donald Trump does something insane in the realm of foreign policy, which is to say whenever he does anything at all in that realm, his defenders attempt to construct some rational explanation.
Sometimes, this is funny — like when the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump wanted to buy Greenland and his supporters had to pretend that attempting to buy the autonomous territory from Denmark was some stroke of genius.
Read Article >“A nasty, brutal fight”: what a US-Iran war would look like


An Iranian military truck carries a US-made Hawk air-defense missile system during a parade on the occasion of the country’s Army Day on April 18, 2017 in Tehran. Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesA deadly opening attack. Nearly untraceable, ruthless proxies spreading chaos on multiple continents. Costly miscalculations. And thousands — perhaps hundreds of thousands — killed in a conflict that would dwarf the war in Iraq.
Welcome to the US-Iran war, which has the potential to be one of the worst conflicts in history.
Read Article >Trump’s Iran whisperer


Brian Hook, the State Department special representative to Iran, testifies during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on October 16, 2019. Tasos Katopodis/Getty ImagesThe way the wind whipped on the other end of the line, the State Department’s special representative for Iran knew the man he’d called was at sea.
“This is Brian Hook,” the American official said, his voice stern and direct. The connection wasn’t great, and the swirling gusts made it hard for the Mediterranean shipping executive on the other end to hear him clearly.
Read Article >Trump says he’s ending the US role in Middle East wars. He’s sending 1,800 troops to Saudi Arabia.


President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with senior military leaders at the White House on October 7, 2019 in Washington, DC. Jabin Botsford/Washington Post via Getty ImagesThe Trump administration will send nearly 2,000 troops and advanced military equipment to Saudi Arabia to deter threats from Iran — a move that will increase America’s presence in the Middle East, even as President Donald Trump falsely boasts about ending wars in the region.
The announcement, made by Secretary of Defense Mark Esper and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley on Friday, continues the administration’s campaign both to increase pressure on Tehran and deepen ties with Riyadh. The US has sent an additional 14,000 military members to the Middle East since May, which the 1,800 authorized Friday will add to.
Read Article >Trump escalates Iran tensions by sanctioning Foreign Minister Javad Zarif


Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is pictured during a news conference at the Foreign Ministry in Berlin on June 27, 2017. Emmanuele Contini/NurPhoto via Getty ImagesThe Trump administration has just sanctioned Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister, as part of its “maximum pressure” campaign on Tehran.
The move, which goes into effect on Wednesday, is one of the most dramatic by President Donald Trump yet since he withdrew America from the Iran nuclear deal — which Zarif helped negotiate — last year. It was expected, though, as Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said last month that Trump ordered him to sanction the Iranian diplomat.
Read Article >Trump is expected to keep a key part of the Iran nuclear deal in place — for now


A general view of a heavy water plant at Arak, Iran, on August 26, 2006. Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesPresident Donald Trump is likely to keep a crucial part of the Iran nuclear deal alive — against the advice of some of the most ardent hawks in his administration.
Multiple reports say the president is planning to renew five waivers allowing Tehran to work with foreign countries on building a civilian nuclear program. That’s a big deal, as cooperating with countries in Europe as well as Russia and China helps Iran create nuclear infrastructure for purposes other than building bombs. Indeed, countries can use nuclear power for creating energy or for medical advancements, among other things.
Read Article >Iran says it arrested 17 people spying for the CIA. The US says it’s fake news.


People walk past a mural depicting a flying Iranian national flag along a street in the Iranian capital, Tehran, on July 22, 2019. AFP/Getty ImagesIran says it has arrested 17 Iranian citizens who were aiding the CIA and that some of them have been sentenced to death — a claim Washington is denying.
Iran’s security agencies “successfully dismantled a [CIA] spy network,” the head of counterintelligence at the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence told reporters in Iran Monday. “Those who deliberately betrayed the country were handed to the judiciary,” he continued, adding that “some were sentenced to death and some to long-term imprisonment.”
Read Article >The US has a risky new plan to protect oil tankers from Iranian attacks


Iranian soldiers take part in the “National Persian Gulf” day in the Strait of Hormuz on April 30, 2019. Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesThe Trump administration is planning to send US Navy ships to help escort oil tankers in the Gulf in order to protect them from possible Iranian aggression. But some experts warn the move could cost a lot of money and risk pulling the US and Iran into a war neither wants.
According to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford and Gen. Mark Milley, the man tapped to replace Dunford, the US is working to build an international coalition whose navies will work together to protect oil tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz — a vital waterway for the global energy trade — and adjoining seas.
Read Article >US-Iran standoff: a timeline


Donald Trump in the Oval Office on June 20, 2019, the same day Iran shot down a US military drone. Alex Wong/Getty Images“Be careful with the threats, Iran,” President Donald Trump tweeted on July 3. “They can come back to bite you like nobody has been bitten before.”
This was Trump’s latest warning to Iran. It came after Iranian President Hassan Rouhani confirmed that, starting this weekend, Iran would exceed stockpile limits on low-enriched uranium, in violation of the 2015 nuclear deal that the US pulled out of last year.
Read Article >Why Iran just violated part of the 2015 nuclear deal


Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif at a joint press conference in Tehran on June 10, 2019. He just confirmed that his country violated part of the Iran nuclear deal. Att Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesIran has officially broken part of its commitment to the 2015 nuclear deal — following through on its months-long threat and further raising tensions with the United States.
In May, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said his country would stockpile more low-enriched uranium than the 660 pounds the nuclear accord allows. The following month, a top Iranian nuclear official said Rouhani’s wasn’t an empty threat and that Tehran would blow past the limit within 10 days.
Read Article >Why Iran is fighting back against Trump’s maximum pressure campaign


Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the United Nations on September 26, 2018, in New York City. Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesIran may have attacked six oil tankers in a strategic Middle Eastern waterway vital for the world’s energy shipping. It for sure shot down an advanced and expensive US military drone. And it may soon no longer abide by part of the 2015 nuclear deal, meaning it could inch closer to potentially obtaining a nuclear bomb someday.
If all this sounds aggressive, it’s because it is.
Read Article >What we know (and what we don’t) about Trump’s decision not to attack Iran


President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House June 20, 2019 in Washington, DC. Alex Wong/Getty ImagesPresident Donald Trump called off an attack on Iran Thursday night, which would’ve been a forceful response to Tehran’s downing of a US military drone earlier that day if the president had followed through.
The two countries have been at odds since Trump withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal last year. But the animosity skyrocketed after the US placed crippling sanctions on Iran’s economy and said it had intelligence that Iran planned attacks on Americans. Iran, meanwhile, responded by seemingly bombing oil tankers in a strategic waterway and openly bringing down a US drone.
Read Article >Iran just made one of its riskiest announcements in years


A reactor building of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant is seen February 27, 2005, in Bushehr, Iran. Majid/Getty ImagesIran says it is just days away from breaking its end of a major nuclear deal by stockpiling forbidden amounts of uranium. If it does so, it would be the latest signal that Tehran may put itself on the path toward a nuclear weapon in direct defiance of President Donald Trump.
The 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran, the US, European powers, Russia, and China put tight restrictions on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The Obama administration’s goal was to block Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon diplomatically, instead of by force.
Read Article >The US decision to withdraw staff from Iraq shows the Iran standoff continues


The US flag is raised outside the US Embassy in Iraq on January 6, 2009. Getty ImagesThe US has ordered a partial withdrawal of State Department employees from Iraq over apparent fears of an imminent Iranian attack.
Early on Wednesday morning, the State Department announced it would remove non-emergency employees from the US Embassy in Baghdad and the consulate in Erbil, a city in northern Iraq. That means some full-time diplomats must now leave the country, which will temporarily bring consular and other services to a halt. Other employees who are vital to everyday functions of the mission, like the cooking staff, will remain for now.
Read Article >Trump’s Iran policy is making war more likely


President Donald Trump announces America’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal on May 8, 2018. Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesThe United States is in the midst of an extremely dangerous standoff with Iran — and President Donald Trump is mainly to blame.
Exactly one year ago Wednesday, Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which lifted sanctions from Tehran in exchange for the country agreeing to curb its nuclear program. That wasn’t enough for Trump, though, who believed the accord was a disaster because it didn’t stop Iran’s growing ballistic missile program or sponsorship of terrorism.
Read Article >Iran just said it won’t comply with parts of the landmark nuclear deal


Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the United Nations on September 26, 2018, in New York City. Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesIran will no longer comply with parts of a landmark nuclear deal that prevented the country from potentially making a bomb. It’s a move that will almost certainly increase tensions with the Trump administration during an already dangerous moment.
In a Wednesday morning speech — exactly one year after Trump ended the US’ commitment to the Iran nuclear deal — Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announced two steps partly to end his country’s commitment to the accord.
Read Article >Iran labels all US troops in the Middle East “terrorists”


A picture taken on December 30, 2018, shows a US soldier riding an armored personnel carrier as a line of US military vehicles patrol Syria’s northern city of Manbij. Delil Souleiman/AFP/Getty ImagesOn Monday, the Trump administration followed through on its promise to formally label a segment of Iran’s military forces “terrorists.” Today, Tehran fired back with its own provocative move: It now considers all US troops in the Middle East to be terrorists too.
Iranian lawmakers overwhelmingly approved the measure after the country’s defense minister introduced a bill on the issue, according to Iranian state TV. Some politicians wanted to name the entirety of the US Army — not just forces deployed in the region — as terrorists, meaning Iran’s reaction actually could’ve been worse.
Read Article >Trump just labeled Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. But it could backfire.


Members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard secure the area outside the Iranian parliament during an attack on the complex in the capital Tehran on June 7, 2017. Hossein Mersadi/AFP/Getty ImagesThe Trump administration on Monday announced it had labeled the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) — Iran’s hugely influential security and military organization responsible for the protection and survival of the regime — as a “foreign terrorist organization.”
That will make it illegal for any American or person in the US to provide IRGC members “material support or resources” — a very broad definition that can mean almost anything — and anyone with connections to the group will be denied visas to visit the US or have their current ones revoked.
Read Article >The US held a global summit to isolate Iran. America isolated itself instead.


Top US leaders and other global officials at the Warsaw summit on Middle East security — which was mainly about thwarting Iran — on February 13, 2019. Sean Gallup/Getty ImagesA US-led conference in Warsaw this week that was intended to isolate Iran has ended up isolating America instead — highlighting one of the central problems of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy.
The two-day, hastily organized summit, which ended on Thursday, was billed as a Middle East security conference. But it was an open secret that the gathering of more than 60 countries was really about getting the world on board with America’s tough-on-Iran policy, even though the US denied that was the case.
Read Article >North Korea, China, and Iran are not happy with Trump’s foreign policy


North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s regime is clearly unhappy with the state of nuclear talks with the United States. Pyongyang Press Corps-Pool/Getty ImagesPresident Donald Trump has taken hard-line stances against North Korea, China, and Iran — and in the last 72 hours, each country pushed back on America’s pressure campaign.
On Friday, North Korea threatened to build more nuclear weapons unless the US offers some sanctions relief. Three days later, Chinese President Xi Jinping said Beijing would survive the trade war with America and continue exporting goods around the world. Also on Monday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani vowed to “break” Trump’s latest and greatest imposition of financial penalties.
Read Article >