Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Iran deal began with George W. Bush

Deal with it.
Deal with it.
Deal with it.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

The just-inked Iran nuclear deal is about to become the center of a partisan political storm: Congressional Republicans are very likely to try to block its implementation, an effort President Obama has vowed to veto. But there’s one fact to keep in mind here: The deal Obama just signed is the extension of an Iran policy that began under George W. Bush.

As the Council on Foreign Relations’ Micah Zenko points out, the Bush administration offered to negotiate directly with Iran over its nuclear program in 2006 — the first such American offer in about 25 years. That doesn’t mean Bush would have necessarily taken the exact same deal as Obama, but it’s a reminder that some of the political rhetoric around the deal is exactly that — political.

Bush's strategy, according to his national security adviser Stephen Hadley, was to offer "the relaxation of existing economic sanctions and active international support for a truly peaceful civilian nuclear program" in exchange for clear limits on Iran's ability to push toward a bomb. Bush's ideal end state, in other words, looked a lot like what this deal accomplishes.

Bush and his team had resisted direct US-Iran negotiations for years before embracing them in 2006. “The Bush administration reversed its position,” experts Robert Art and Patrick Cronin write, “because it had no choice.” There was no way to get the Europeans, the Russians, and the Chinese on board for an international sanctions regime “unless the United States took every diplomatic step possible to engage it.”

Again, that’s precisely Obama’s logic: Without some kind of good-faith effort at a negotiated deal, the sanctions regime Bush and Obama put together would fall apart.

There are, naturally, significant differences between the Obama and Bush negotiating strategy: In 2006, Bush insisted Iran suspend uranium enrichment before nuclear talks could begin, which Obama didn’t. But the key point here is that the deal, so partisan today, follows a set of principles that even George W. Bush embraced.

Politics
We have no idea if Iran can still build a bombWe have no idea if Iran can still build a bomb
Politics

The central goal of the war is nowhere near a resolution.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
“A whole civilization will die tonight”: How Trump is threatening war crimes“A whole civilization will die tonight”: How Trump is threatening war crimes
Politics

Bombing all of Iran’s bridges and power plants would be illegal.

By Joshua Keating
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Is this the beginning of the end of the war in Iran?Is this the beginning of the end of the war in Iran?
Politics

Trump signaled that he’s ready to wrap up the conflict, but that may not be up to him.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Trump says the Iran war is over. So why won’t he end it?Trump says the Iran war is over. So why won’t he end it?
Politics

It may not be possible to TACO out of this one.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Here’s how Iran could become a “forever war”Here’s how Iran could become a “forever war”
Politics

“Mowing the grass,” explained.

By Joshua Keating