Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Supreme Court’s ruling against the Florida death penalty system, explained

The US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

In an 8-1 decision on Tuesday, the US Supreme Court issued a mostly procedural ruling against Florida’s death penalty system, ultimately requiring that the state change how it issues death sentences.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, came down to procedure. Florida law requires that a jury merely recommend whether a death sentence should be applied in a capital case, with the judge making the final decision on the sentence. The US Supreme Court, in a decision that overturned the Florida Supreme Court, ruled that this scheme violates the Sixth Amendment because it takes away the defendant’s right to have his sentence based on a jury’s verdict.

“The Sixth Amendment protects a defendant’s right to an impartial jury,” Sotomayor wrote. “This right required Florida to base Timothy Hurst’s death sentence on a jury’s verdict, not a judge’s factfinding. Florida’s sentencing scheme, which required the judge alone to find the existence of an aggravating circumstance, is therefore unconstitutional.”

It’s unclear what effect, if any, this will ultimately have on Hurst’s case in Florida. Hurst, who was convicted for a 1998 murder, brought the case all the way to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Florida death sentencing scheme violated the Sixth Amendment and procedure set through the 2002 Supreme Court case Ring v. Arizona. But juries twice recommended death sentences for Hurst, so it’s possible they will repeat the same sentence now that his case is going back to Florida to implement the Supreme Court’s decision.

Still, the Supreme Court ruling could also impact other cases in Florida, which has one of the largest death rows in the US. It’s unlikely the Republican-dominated state will abolish capital punishment, but will have to at least change sentencing procedures.

Michael Doyle reported for McClatchy that only three of the 30 other death penalty states use a sentencing scheme similar to Florida’s: Alabama, Delaware, and Montana.

More in Politics

America, Actually
Rubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it nowRubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it now
America, Actually

An interview with the senator Swalwell called his “best friend.”

By Astead Herndon
The Logoff
Is the Strait of Hormuz really open?Is the Strait of Hormuz really open?
The Logoff

A busy day of Iran news, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
An expert forecasts how the Iran war could hit your budgetAn expert forecasts how the Iran war could hit your budget
Politics

The Strait of Hormuz is reopening. But the war’s impacts on the food economy could linger.

By Eric Levitz
The Logoff
Trump’s ceasefire announcement, briefly explainedTrump’s ceasefire announcement, briefly explained
The Logoff

An Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is set to take effect Thursday evening.

By Cameron Peters
Podcasts
What to know about the Israel-Lebanon conflictWhat to know about the Israel-Lebanon conflict
Podcast
Podcasts

A journalist explains what it’s like in Lebanon right now.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Today, Explained newsletter
Trump’s bungled Iran negotiations didn’t have to go this wayTrump’s bungled Iran negotiations didn’t have to go this way
Today, Explained newsletter

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. She sees several areas where Trump is going wrong.

By Caitlin Dewey