Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

After Mueller’s Russian indictments, Trump returns to a familiar line: blame Obama

Trump pointed out Obama was president during the 2016 election, which is true.

Barack Obama and Donald Trump shake hands.
Barack Obama and Donald Trump shake hands.
Former US President Barack Obama congratulates President Donald Trump after he took the oath of office on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Emily Stewart
Emily Stewart covered business and economics for Vox and wrote the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism. Before joining Vox, she worked for TheStreet.

President Donald Trump reacted Saturday to special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers for interfering in the 2016 US presidential election with a familiar tactic: blame Obama.

Trump, who is spending the weekend at his Trump Turnberry golf course in Scotland ahead of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, fired off a series of tweets on Saturday morning before heading to play some golf. Among them: a reaction to Mueller’s Friday indictment of 12 Russians for crimes related to hacking and publicly releasing Democrats’ emails in 2016.

The president wrote that the “stories you heard” about the Russians “took place during the Obama Administration” and not his — a fairly obvious point. He asked why President Barack Obama didn’t act sooner and name-checked a pair of conspiracy theories about the Democratic National Committee’s server and the so-called “deep state,” both common themes for the president.

Vox’s Andrew Prokop has a full explanation of Mueller’s Friday indictments, but here’s what they boil down to: The special counsel alleges Russian intelligence officers were behind hackings of the DNC, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), and Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. They allegedly coordinated to release information they got in the hackings to sway the election, actions which the US intelligence community has said were meant to hurt Clinton and help Trump.

Though the crimes laid out in Friday’s indictment fall clearly within the scope of damaging Clinton, there are no allegations that anyone from the Trump campaign colluded with the 12 Russians to do so — a fact the White House pointed to in its official reaction.

The charges “include no allegations of knowing involvement by anyone on the campaign and no allegations that the alleged hacking affected the election result,” White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said in a statement Friday.

Trump later in the day on Saturday returned to the subject. He said his predecessor failed to act on Russian meddling because he assumed Hillary Clinton would win the presidency and also tossed in a shot at the “Fake News.”

Why Obama didn’t act sooner is complicated

The FBI in July 2016 began investigating the Russian government’s meddling in the US election. The following month, the CIA informed Obama there was evidence that Putin was directly involved in the attacks. He asked his team, including Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and CIA Director John Brennan, to look into the matter, and multiple other members of the administration were pulled in.

What Obama did not do was make a splashy announcement that Russia was trying to interfere, apparently, to swing the election to Trump.

Democratic and Republican leaders with knowledge of Russia’s activities squabbled over whether and how to inform the public. The Washington Post last year laid out the struggle, with Democrats pushing for Obama to go public with what was happening and Republicans pushing against it. According to Post, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) “voiced skepticism” of the intelligence community’s evidence.

Former Vice President Joe Biden said early this year at an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations that McConnell refused to sign a bipartisan statement condemning Russia’s activities in 2016, and the Obama administration worried that without a bipartisan front, it would look like they were trying to influence the election.

“Can you imagine if the president called a press conference in October, with this fella, [Trump campaign CEO Steve] Bannon, and company, and said, ‘Tell you what: Russians are trying to interfere in our elections and we have to do something about it,’” Biden said, according to Politico. “What do you think would have happened? Would things have gotten better, or would it further look like we were trying to delegitimize the electoral process, because of our opponent?”

In October 2016, the Obama administration formally accused the Russian government of hacking the DNC, but it came just a half hour before the now-infamous Access Hollywood tape leaked.


Update: Story updated with second Trump tweet.

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters