Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Dahlia Lithwick has been covering the Supreme Court for 20 years. Here’s the one book she says you need to read.

On this week’s episode of the Ezra Klein Show, the Slate reporter tracks the Court’s role in politics and vice versa.

Neil Gorsuch Is Sworn In As Associate Justice To Supreme Court
Neil Gorsuch Is Sworn In As Associate Justice To Supreme Court
Eric Thayer/Getty Images

Dahlia Lithwick, Slate’s legal correspondent, has been tirelessly covering the dramatic resignation of Justice Anthony Kennedy from the Supreme Court on television appearances, Slate, and on her own podcast, Amicus. Vox’s Ezra Klein called her “one of the smartest and most humane legal analysts we have” when they sat down to talk to about what Justice Kennedy’s retirement means for American democracy.

In this conversation on The Ezra Klein Show, Lithwick makes a compelling case that Americans have had a sort of magical thinking about the justice system. That “the courts fly in on silver unicorns and promote justice and democracy.” She mentions Ian Millhiser’s book, Injustices, as a good reminder that “the Court has always been a small-c conservative institution.”

She also discusses her changing views on lifetime appointments, the role of religion in the justice system, and legal reporters’ “Patty Hearst syndrome” toward the Supreme Court.

When asked about book recommendations for somebody who wants to understand the Supreme Court better, Lithwick only offers one suggestion: One Person, No Vote by Carol Anderson (who appeared on the podcast a few months ago). It’s a book that on its face doesn’t relate to the Court but, according to Lithwick, is crucial to understanding how it became less of a small-d democratic institution.

She believes “we need to reclaim very, very strongly the idea that there have been all kinds of assaults on voting. We need to understand what they are and how they’re happening and work really, really meticulously to reverse engineer that.”

You can listen to the full conversation with Dahlia Lithwick on The Ezra Klein Show by subscribing on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts, or by streaming the episode here:

More in Podcasts

Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Explain It to Me
Hope vs. optimism, explainedHope vs. optimism, explained
Podcast
Explain It to Me

A psychology professor makes the case for hope.

By Jonquilyn Hill
Podcasts
How fan fiction went mainstreamHow fan fiction went mainstream
Podcast
Podcasts

The community that underpins Heated Rivalry, explained.

By Danielle Hewitt and Noel King
Podcasts
Pete Hegseth preaches “maximum lethality.” What has that meant in Iran?Pete Hegseth preaches “maximum lethality.” What has that meant in Iran?
Podcast
Podcasts

How Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump are waging war in Iran.

By Ariana Aspuru and Sean Rameswaram
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram